Профессионалдық обыр: жаһандық ауыртпалық, негізгі канцерогендер, диагностикалау мәселелері және алдын алу перспективалары

Кәсіби қатерлі ісік қазіргі еңбек медицинасы мен қоғамдық денсаулық сақ-таудың маңызды мәселелерінің бірі болып табылады. Мақалада кәсіби қатерлі ісіктердің әлемдік ауыртпалығы, негізгі өндірістік канцерогендер, тыныс алу мүшелерінің кәсіби обыры және халықаралық тіркеу тәжірибесі бойынша зама-науи деректер жинақталған. Тау-кен өнеркәсібі қызметкерлеріндегі кәсіби қатерлі ісік және Қазақстандағы тіркеудің жеткіліксіздігі мәселесіне ерекше назар ауда-рылды. Аурудың кәсіппен байланысын анықтау критерийлері, латентті кезеңдер, оксидативті стресс, иммунологиялық бұзылыстар және молекулалық биомаркер-лердің рөлі қарастырылды. Кәсіби қатерлі ісіктің ұлттық тіркелімін құру және канцерогендік қауіпті өндірістердегі қызметкерлерді тәуекелге бағдарланған ба-қылауды енгізу қажеттілігі негізделді.

1. IARC. IARC Monographs on the Identification of Carcinogenic Hazards to Humans. List of Classifications. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2024.

2. Loomis D., Guha N., Hall A.L., Straif K. Identifying occupational carcinogens: an update from the IARC Monographs // Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2018. Vol. 75. No. 8. P. 593–603. DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2017-104944.

3. International Labour Organization. Safety and Health at the Heart of the Future of Work. Geneva: ILO, 2019.

4. European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. Work-related Cancer: Facts and Figures. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2023.

5. Takala J. Eliminating occupational cancer // Industrial Health. 2015. Vol. 53. No. 4. P. 307–309. DOI: 10.2486/indhealth.53.307.

6. GBD 2019 Risk Factors Collaborators. Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 // The Lancet. 2020. Vol. 396. P. 1223–1249. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30752-2.

7. Rushton L., Hutchings S.J., Fortunato L. et al. Occupational cancer burden in Great Britain // British Journal of Cancer. 2012. Vol. 107. Suppl. 1. P. S3–S7. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2012.112.

8. Furuya S., Chimed-Ochir O., Takahashi K. et al. Global asbestos disaster // International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2018. Vol. 15. No. 5. Art. 1000. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15051000.

9. Takahashi K., Landrigan P.J. The global health dimensions of asbestos and asbestos-related diseases // Annals of Global Health. 2016. Vol. 82. No. 1. P. 209–213. DOI: 10.1016/j.aogh.2016.01.012.

10. Stayner L., Welch L.S., Lemen R. The worldwide pandemic of asbestos-related diseases // Annual Review of Public Health. 2013. Vol. 34. P. 205–216. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031811-124704.

11. Frank A.L., Joshi T.K. The global spread of asbestos // Annals of Global Health. 2014. Vol. 80. No. 4. P. 257–262. DOI: 10.1016/j.aogh.2014.09.016.

12. Consonni D., De Matteis S., Pesatori A.C. Lung cancer and occupational exposure // La Medicina del Lavoro. 2018. Vol. 109. No. 6. P. 407–413. DOI: 10.23749/mdl.v109i6.7640.

13. Olsson A.C., Gustavsson P., Kromhout H. et al. Occupational exposure to diesel motor emissions and lung cancer risk // American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 2011. Vol. 183. No. 7. P. 941–948. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201006-0947OC.

14. Attfield M.D., Schleiff P.L., Lubin J.H. et al. The Diesel Exhaust in Miners Study: a cohort mortality study // Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2012. Vol. 104. No. 11. P. 869–883. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djs035.

15. Silverman D.T., Samanic C.M., Lubin J.H. et al. The Diesel Exhaust in Miners Study: a nested case-control study // Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2012. Vol. 104. No. 11. P. 855–868. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djs034.

16. Benbrahim-Tallaa L., Baan R.A., Grosse Y. et al. Carcinogenicity of diesel-engine and gasoline-engine exhausts and some nitroarenes // The Lancet Oncology. 2012. Vol. 13. No. 7. P. 663–664. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70280-2.

17. Schubauer-Berigan M.K., Daniels R.D., Bertke S.J. et al. Radionuclide exposure and cancer mortality among U.S. nuclear workers // Radiation Research. 2015. Vol. 183. No. 6. P. 620–631. DOI: 10.1667/RR13879.1.

18. Richardson D.B., Cardis E., Daniels R.D. et al. Risk of cancer from occupational exposure to ionising radiation: retrospective cohort study of workers in France, the United Kingdom, and the United States (INWORKS) // BMJ. 2015. Vol. 351. P. h5359. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.h5359.

19. Leuraud K., Richardson D.B., Cardis E. et al. Ionising radiation and risk of death from leukaemia and lymphoma in radiation-monitored workers (INWORKS) // The Lancet Haematology. 2015. Vol. 2. No. 7. P. e276–e281. DOI: 10.1016/S2352-3026(15)00094-0.

20. Vlaanderen J., Lan Q., Kromhout H. et al. Occupational benzene exposure and the risk of lymphoma subtypes // Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2011. Vol. 68. No. 4. P. 250–257. DOI: 10.1136/oem.2010.058404.

21. Khalade A., Jaakkola M.S., Pukkala E., Jaakkola J.J.K. Exposure to benzene at work and the risk of leukemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis // Environmental Health. 2010. Vol. 9. Art. 31. DOI: 10.1186/1476-069X-9-31.

22. Barnes J.L., Zubair M., John K. et al. Carcinogens and DNA damage // Biochemical Society Transactions. 2018. Vol. 46. No. 5. P. 1213–1224. DOI: 10.1042/BST20180519.

23. Hanahan D. Hallmarks of cancer: new dimensions // Cancer Discovery. 2022. Vol. 12. No. 1. P. 31–46. DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-21-1059.

24. Wild C.P. Complementing the genome with an exposome: the outstanding challenge of environmental exposure measurement in molecular epidemiology // Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention. 2005. Vol. 14. No. 8. P. 1847–1850. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0456.

25. Miller G.W., Jones D.P. The nature of nurture: refining the definition of the exposome // Toxicological Sciences. 2014. Vol. 137. No. 1. P. 1–2. DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kft251.

26. Fenga C. Occupational exposure and risk of breast cancer // Biomedical Reports. 2016. Vol. 4. No. 3. P. 282–292. DOI: 10.3892/br.2016.575.

27. Straif K., Benbrahim-Tallaa L., Baan R. et al. A review of human carcinogens — Part C: metals, arsenic, dusts, and fibres // The Lancet Oncology. 2009. Vol. 10. No. 5. P. 453–454. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70096-8.

28. Driscoll T., Takala J., Steenland K. et al. Review of estimates of the global burden of injury and illness due to occupational exposures // American Journal of Industrial Medicine. 2005. Vol. 48. No. 6. P. 491–502. DOI: 10.1002/ajim.20286.

29. Lee P.N. Relation between exposure to asbestos and smoking jointly and the risk of lung cancer // Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2001. Vol. 58. No. 3. P. 145–153. DOI: 10.1136/oem.58.3.145.

30. Pega F., Náfrádi B., Momen N.C. et al. Global, regional, and national burdens of ischemic heart disease and stroke attributable to exposure to long working hours for 194 countries, 2000–2016 // Environment International. 2021. Vol. 154. Art. 106595. DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106595.

31. World Health Organization, International Labour Organization. WHO/ILO Joint Estimates of the Work-related Burden of Disease and Injury, 2000–2016: Global Monitoring Report. Geneva: World Health Organization; International Labour Organization, 2021.

32. International Labour Organization. Occupational Cancer Convention, 1974 (No. 139). Geneva: ILO, 1974.

33. World Health Organization. Cancer: Fact Sheet. Geneva: WHO, 2024.

34. Kazakh Institute of Oncology and Radiology. Cancer Care Indicators and Oncology Statistics of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Almaty: KazIOR, 2024.

35. National Lung Screening Trial Research Team. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening // New England Journal of Medicine. 2011. Vol. 365. P. 395–409. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1102873.